Workshop: Fernandina Airport master plan will map noise, not recommend ways to reduce it

Posted

FERNANDINA BEACH — Residents frustrated by repetitive flight-school operations at Fernandina Beach Municipal Airport brought their complaints to Saturday's airport master plan open house, but the consultants preparing the plan said it will not recommend specific measures to reduce aircraft noise.

Instead, the master plan will identify existing and projected noise exposure around the airport. Determining how to reduce that noise would require a separate study, according to Mike Kotlow, senior aviation planner with AVCON Inc., the consulting firm preparing the airport's long-range master plan.

"Based on our existing and forecast conditions, we're going to identify the noise contours associated with it," Kotlow said. "The master plan itself doesn't identify mitigation measures."
 

"That's a separate, you know, study that would need to occur."

The distinction emerged during Saturday's public workshop at the airport terminal, where residents reviewed displays outlining potential future airport development and spoke individually with airport officials and planning consultants.
 

A separate airport noise briefing is scheduled for the City Commission on Nov. 4, providing another opportunity for residents to raise concerns about flight-training operations.

Randy Hatton, who lives on First Avenue, said he attended Saturday's workshop specifically to learn what could be done about aircraft noise from flight schools.
 

"I understand airports have planes taking off and landing all the time, but it's the repetitive, sometimes every minute, sometimes all day long, that is maddening. It's maddening," Hatton said.

"And, I mean, there has to be a way where we can agree to have some mitigation where it's not as problematic as it is right now."
 

Hatton said he submitted written comments during the workshop and had previously expressed his concerns on social media.

Denean and Bob Bradecamp, who live on Persimmon Circle off Simmons Road just east of 14th Street, described how airport operations have changed during their 10 years living near the airport.
 

"We've been here 10 years, and it was a sleepy airport when we moved here 10 years ago," Bob Bradecamp said. "They didn't have the training schools coming in and out multiple times a day."

 
Bob and Denean Bradecamp
Bob and Denean Bradecamp
 
 
Denean Bradecamp said repeated training flights sometimes force the couple indoors when they are trying to enjoy their morning coffee. She said the flights are particularly disruptive in the early morning and evening, when residents want to spend time outdoors.
 

Her husband said some operations begin as early as 6:30 a.m.

Bob Bradecamp also questioned why aircraft using the municipal airport are not charged landing fees comparable to fees paid by users of other city facilities.
 

"People landing here and taking off and making all sorts of noise, they don't pay a fee. I find that troublesome," he said.

Bradecamp compared the airport to the city golf course and marina, where users pay fees, arguing that city-owned facilities should improve residents' quality of life.
 

"But it's an asset of the city that is not being used to improve the quality of life of its citizens," he said.

 

Federal aviation regulations and obligations associated with federal airport grants can limit a municipality's ability to restrict airport operations. Whether specific landing fees or operating restrictions could be imposed at Fernandina Beach would require further examination of the airport's grant agreements and applicable FAA requirements.

 

The airport has been the subject of complaints from residents of nearby neighborhoods, including Parkway North and Crane Island, over repetitive touch-and-go training operations.

 

Aircraft tracking data previously examined by the Fernandina Observer documented 14,748 touch-and-go maneuvers during the 12 months ending Sept. 30, 2025, an average of about 40 per day.

 

Touch-and-go maneuvers involve an aircraft landing and immediately taking off again, allowing student pilots to practice repeated approaches and landings.

 

The city's voluntary noise-abatement guidelines recommend that pilots conduct no more than five consecutive touch-and-go maneuvers before leaving the airport traffic pattern. The guidelines are not mandatory.

Saturday's workshop was organized as an informal open house rather than a public hearing with speakers addressing an audience.
 

Residents could walk among displays showing airport development alternatives and speak directly with airport representatives and AVCON planners. The consulting firm is evaluating airport operations, forecasting future aviation needs, developing alternatives for airport improvements and preparing the master plan for review by the Federal Aviation Administration.

City Commissioners Genece Minshew and Joyce Tuten, along with City Manager Sarah Campbell, also attended the workshop.
 

Joining residents in reviewing the plans were numerous pilots based at the airport. Their primary interests were future runway configurations and plans for more aircraft hangars.

 
 

Nathan Coyle, who manages airport operations under contract with the city, said the open-house format follows FAA recommendations intended to encourage individual discussions and public participation.

Coyle explained that the master plan process involves two groups providing feedback: technical airport users, including pilots, and the general public.
 

Technical participants evaluate matters such as airspace requirements, airport geometry and operational limitations. Residents can address community impacts and their preferences for future airport development.

"Neither of them has any more influence," Coyle said, explaining that planners consider comments from both groups when preparing the draft plan.
 

Coyle said the FAA reviews and approves certain technical assumptions during the planning process, including the types and categories of aircraft used to establish future airport design requirements.

Those assumptions influence runway and taxiway planning, development alternatives and other airport improvements.
 

Saturday's displays focused on alternatives for using and developing airport property. Environmental and financial analysis will follow as the planning process advances.

Kotlow, who is managing the master plan process for AVCON, and senior planner Jack Thompson were among the consulting firm's representatives at the workshop.
 

Asked how residents' comments would be documented and conveyed to the FAA, Kotlow said written submissions would become part of the master plan record.

"We'll incorporate the comments, the public comments, into the plan, and we will consider the feedback and address it and potentially include their recommendations in the plan," Kotlow said.
 

"All the comment forms that are filled out will be included in appendix to the master plan, and we'll do our best to address all the public comments that we receive."

Residents could submit paper comment cards at the workshop or use a QR code linked to an electronic comment system. Comments can also be submitted through the master plan website throughout the planning process.
 

Coyle said informal conversations would be discussed by the planning team, but written comments provide a documented record for inclusion in the plan.

Kotlow said planners would walk residents through the displays and address questions about the proposed development alternatives.
 

Although the master plan will examine aircraft noise, its noise contours will depict geographic areas exposed to different levels of aircraft noise based on existing operations and projected activity. The document will not establish specific measures to reduce that exposure.

Kotlow acknowledged the concerns of residents living near the airport.
 

"But we understand the sensitivity around this airport and the community, and, you know, we are definitely identifying the need to do follow-up efforts like the workshop and potentially other things as part of the master plan," he said.

He pointed to the Nov. 4 City Commission briefing as the next opportunity for a more direct discussion of aircraft noise.
 

"The master plan doesn't necessarily address the noise components as much," Kotlow said. "That briefing to the city commission on the 4th is really going to be the opportunity for that."

 

The city plans to hold a second public meeting as the airport master plan process advances, but a date has not been announced.

Editor's Note: For full transparency, Fernandina Observer writer Mike Lednovich lives in Parkway North, one of the neighborhoods affected by aircraft noise from flight-school operations at Fernandina Beach Municipal Airport. His spouse is a member of an organized group of homeowners seeking solutions to the noise problem. Lednovich is not a member of the group and does not participate in its activities. The Observer's coverage of airport operations and the master planning process is conducted independently, with a commitment to accurate, fair and balanced reporting.

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here