FERNANDINA BEACH — Property owners living adjacent to the historic Amelia Island Lighthouse are raising concerns over proposals that could increase tourism activity at one of the city's most recognizable landmarks.
At last Tuesday's City Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) meeting, three homeowners voiced worries about how potential changes designed to expand public access and generate revenue from the lighthouse could affect their quality of life.
The Amelia Island Lighthouse is one of Fernandina Beach's most significant historic landmarks. Built between 1838 and 1839 using materials from an earlier lighthouse on Cumberland Island, Georgia, it is the oldest existing lighthouse in Florida and the only surviving lighthouse from Florida's Territorial Period. The lighthouse continues to guide vessels entering the St. Marys River and Fernandina Harbor and remains one of the city's most recognizable symbols.

Parks and Recreation Director Scott Mikelson sought to reassure residents that no final plans have been developed.
He explained that the city's immediate focus is replacing deteriorating chain-link fencing around portions of the property and installing pavers around the lighthouse base to improve the appearance of the grounds. He said discussions about expanded public access remain in the early stages.
"We're not ready yet. We still have some work to do on the interior of the lighthouse," Mikelson said.
"We're in the very infancy of this," Mikelson said. "We're not ready to make a proposal."

"I sit out there in the yard, and I see car after car after car come up. They pull up. They get out. They take their pictures. And then here we go down the back, backing up. They're either backing up the people's driveways, or they're backing up all the way down onto Lighthouse Circle."
"There has been talks of making that a parking area, but they're just talks right now because with that, that's a runoff area," Mikelson said. "How is that going to affect the neighbors' runoff? So we need to take all that into consideration."
"How are you going to pay for all of this? And what's the long-term goal?" she asked. "You're earning revenue. Where's a budget that shows how are you going to maintain it? You're going to have people in and around the lighthouse. You have to clean, maintain it."
Crabtree also expressed concerns that paving additional areas for parking could worsen existing drainage problems.
Mikelson told residents they would be included in any future planning process before changes are proposed.
5 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here
Mark Tomes
I remember having birthday parties in the lighthouse as a kid, which makes me an expert on… absolutely nothing. Just throwing some old-time credentials around. I can see some expanded access to the lighthouse, especially being able to go up to the top and view out, but neighborhood and environmental concerns should be paramount.
Monday, June 15 Report this
LucyP74
I agree Mark. The GREED of our local governments is off the chain anymore. Rather than being concerned about the environment or their constituents, it’s more about how much money they can stuff into their coffers. Perhaps if they managed what they received better, then it wouldn’t be so difficult. Every household has to be mindful of how their dollars are spent, so perhaps our local governments need to tighten their belts up too As they do that, maybe they should open up their ears and start listening to their constituents and HEAR what they are saying. The Nassau County I grew up in has been decimated and I am heartbroken.
Monday, June 15 Report this
brucebaugh
Here are some suggestions: 1. Improve the lighthouse and grounds to ensure they are safe for visitors. 2. Protect the neighbors and the neighborhood by having paying visitors meet and park at the rec center and board a small bus that takes them to the lighthouse for a tour. Run the tours hourly and only on specified days and times. 3. On the tour, include lectures about the history of the lighthouse in the adjacent buildings.
Monday, June 15 Report this
Karen1952
I walk my dog up on Lighthouse Circle a lot. Minschew’s thoughtless proposal would devastate the area. Efforts to get a tree owner who owns an amazing tree right by the entrance to the lighthouse and to put it into the Heritage Tree Program is resisting as they are afraid people will come on their property to get a closer view of the tree. The area is full of magnificent trees that will be hurt by increased traffic. Will completely trash the surrounding area. Absolute tone deaf to the surroundings community.
Monday, June 15 Report this
EPD3EPD3
The Lighthouse Park could be an amazing community asset with lighthouse access, open views east over Egans Creek, hands-on historical displays. Whether people would pay for the experience is worth some research. Respectful access is a crucial issue. No development can happen if the only access is by car. It’s not safe. Public safety could not get up the driveway if it’s blocked by cars going the other way. Ptivate vehicle access is not respectful to immediate neighbors or with the neighborhood. Would people pay enough in order to climb the lighthouse to cover development costs, parking, bus transportation, personnel and insurance? I think we should find out. It could be amazing.
Monday, June 15 Report this