Fernandina Observer logo>

RYAM Ethanol Exemption Bill Advances to House Vote

Posted
By Mike Lednovich

A proposed state legislative definition of bioethanol production as 'fermentation' that would nullify Fernandina Beach's denial of Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) plans to build a production plant was heard Tuesday by the House Commerce Committee.

The House Commerce Committee passed the bill and advanced it to a House vote. The bill passed 15-8.

House bill 579a states:

"Production of ethanol from plants or plant products by fermentation, distillation, or drying does not constitute chemical manufacturing or chemical refining. This subsection is intended to be remedial and clarifying in nature and shall apply retroactively to any law, regulation, or ordinance or any interpretation thereof."

The bill is the House version of an earlier State Senate bill that contained the same language. The Senate bill had advanced but has since been withdrawn.

The bill was filed by State Rep. Toby Overdorf, R-Palm City.
 
Overdorf told the committee the ethanol process was similar from a bakery to a distillery.
 
"Something going through fermentation is not a chemical plant," he said.
 
RYAM is currently suing the city of Fernandina Beach over its denial to build the facility on the grounds that bioethanol is 'chemical manufacturing', which is not allowed under the city's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code.
 
If passed into law, the bill would nullify the city's outside legal expert's previous opinion that RYAM's proposed bioethanol process is 'chemical manufacturing.' The legal ruling was the basis of the city's rejection of RYAM's application to construct the $51 million facility at its Gum Street complex.
 
Once in operation, the production plant would generate 7.5 million gallons of bioethanol yearly that would be transported for sale at other locations. The facility would include several large storage tanks.
 
Last month, City Manager Sarah Campbell sent RYAM a notice that its application to construct the bioethanol facility would not be reviewed by the city because chemical manufacturing is not permitted in the city.
 
RYAM has also filed a lawsuit against the city in federal court claiming the city failed to follow any established procedures in order to deny its application and acted improperly towards the company.
 
That action by RYAM followed a lawsuit in Nassau County claiming the city acted improperly in processing its application for the project.

Comments

2 comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here

  • RebeccaP

    Contact committee members. Contact details here:

    https://www.flhouse.gov/Sections/Committees/committeesdetail.aspx?CommitteeId=3285

    Tuesday, April 22, 2025 Report this

  • Carl McDonald

    Today (Sunday, 4/28) I spoke with Senator Yarborough's office and made the statement that [our] senator was present during the House committee vote on ethanol. The Senator's aide challenged me saying, "Why would the Senator be present for a House committee vote, and how do you come about this information?"

    I replied, "Exactly! Good question! The only answer must be the Senator supports the ethanol amendment and has a personal interest in the outcome of the vote." I explained my source was the Observer including a picture of the Senator on the front row of observers to the committee vote. This guy is selling us out.

    Monday, April 28, 2025 Report this

Other items that may interest you

17 restaurants passed the inspection at the first …

City waterfront board advances harbor plan as costs of …

What could Fernandina’s waterfront look like? New …

Atlantic Avenue project parking loss draws pushback as …

© Copyright 2026 Fernandina Observer
Contributions or gifts to the Fernandina Observer are tax-deductible.
Our federal EIN is 88-2158428.
Powered by Creative Circle Media Solutions